Aug. 5th, 2005

dot_fennel: (Default)
This was entertaining, but the more I think about it, the more skeptical I am that anyone could make a *worse* documentary on this subject. It's about clowns and krumpers, two (somewhat) different schools of the frenetic Los Angeles improv hip-hop dancing the movie depicts. The clowns get their name-- and their clown costumes-- from Tommy the Clown, a former birthday-party entertainer who says he invented the whole thing. Nobody gives an origin or even a definition for 'krump' in the movie, though considering how people mention "getting krump", it seems like there must be influence from 'crunk', linguistically if not musically.

So, the dancing is great, and it wouldn't strain anyone's patience to watch it for 90 minutes. But instead, the second half is full of genuinely sad events framed as though the director thinks they're emotionally-manipulative melodrama, which goes some distance toward erasing their impact, followed by a sequence about how great Jesus is that's obnoxious if the director is proselytizing, and incompetent if, contrary to appearances, he isn't.

If I sound unusually willing to be bitter about aesthetic flaws, it's because, ultimately, director David LaChapelle seems to be cheating. The film's most impressive dance sequences have footage from several dancers, in different places at different times, strung together to the same music. This is an impressive technical feat (especially if, as a disclaimer that I missed at the beginning of the movie apparently said, none of the footage was sped up), but as the movie goes on, the music becomes less plausible: first Dizzee Rascal (which maybe people do krump to, I don't know), then African tribal music, then a schmaltzy gospel song. For such radically expressive dancing, not knowing what the music it was performed to actually sounded like is frustrating, and not thinking your audience needs to know is contemptuous.

Worse, I found out after I saw the movie that LaChapelle is a music video director who's used krumpers (some appearing in Rize) in videos for Christina Aguilera and other chart stars-- which makes the bit at the end with a guy talking about how krumping and clowning are their own thing, a style that will never be exploited by mainstream culture, ridiculously cynical. I saw the movie with M, who I think exited it sharing my mixture of exhilaration and irritation. Sadly, on reflection, the latter has won out for me. If you rent it when it comes out on video, you can safely shut it off at the scene where Tommy the Clown breaks down in tears and you won't be missing anything.

dot_fennel: (Default)
The Wedding Present - "Felicity" (mp3)

Wedding Present singer David Gedge once introduced this song with "This is a William Shatner number"-- there's a Wedding Present song called "Shatner" which this has nothing to do with; "Felicity" is a cover of an Orange Juice song, written by Orange Juice's less active songwriter... a man named James Kirk. Har.

The rhythm-guitar player strumming at unearthly speed is Peter Solowka, who unfortunately left the band early on. I've never been able to appreciate the original version of this song, whose singer makes it sound like the refrain ("Felicity... I guess so") is a result of his own apathy, and how is that interesting? When the Wedding Present play it, Gedge sings as if possessed, demonstrating the difference between equanimity and ambivalence.

dot_fennel: (Default)
Graffiti from Pompeii. I didn't realize so much of it had survived, and I find it ineluctably strange to read. It's not just that in translation some of the lewd ones are kind of formal; somehow it puts me off-balance to realize that people had transitory thoughts 2000 years ago. Dust to dust.

Profile

dot_fennel: (Default)
Dorothy Fennel

February 2016

S M T W T F S
 123456
7891011 1213
14151617181920
21222324252627
2829     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 23rd, 2025 11:06 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios